[U-Boot] [ARM] [STATUS] **NO** Increasingly high build failures

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Le 19/04/2012 12:04, Albert ARIBAUD a ?crit :
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Le 19/04/2012 11:51, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
>> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>>
>> In message<4F8FBB22.5000205@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I just did another round of ./MAKEALL arm with MG/CS 2011.09-69, and the
>>> failure rate is rising to say the least, with 277 boards failing out of
>>> 278. :(
>>
>> Which version of GCC is this?
>>
>> Recent tests with ELDK 5.2 (which is based on gcc version 4.6.4
>> 20120303) show no such problems.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Wolfgang Denk
>
> Seems there was a misconfiguration in my toolchain and repo -- redoing
> the mass build with correct settings, will update notice when done

After triple-checking the I was using the right commit (my current 
master) and the right toolchain ("gcc version 4.6.1 (Sourcery CodeBench 
Lite 2011.09-69)"), ./MAKEALL arm shows the following:

--------------------- SUMMARY ----------------------------
Boards compiled: 277
Boards with warnings or errors: 28 ( VCMA9 smdk2410 nhk8815 
nhk8815_onenand apollon igep0020 igep0030 omap4_panda omap4_sdp4430 
omap5_evm s5p_goni smdkc100 s5pc210_universal seaboard ventana balloon3 
lubbock palmld palmtc polaris pxa255_idp trizepsiv vpac270_nor_128 
vpac270_nor_256 vpac270_ond_256 xaeniax zipitz2 colibri_pxa270 )
----------------------------------------------------------

... with still 3 build errors, for omap4_panda, omap4_sdp4430 and 
omap5_evm: 'internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at 
varasm.c:2635', and 57 warnings of which 48 are 'uses variable-size 
enums yet the output is to use 32-bit enums' and 9 are 'variable [...] 
set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]'

So the only 'issue' is the enums, for which I'll seek a solution.

Apologies -- especially to Simon G.* -- for the noise.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.