From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suresh Jayaraman Subject: Re: uninitialized variables in the 5.4 release Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:06:28 +0530 Message-ID: <4F90F5DC.7070005@suse.com> References: <20120419175242.GR12994@hip.fritz.box> <20120419140144.7b435b50@corrin.poochiereds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_M=FCller?= , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff Layton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120419140144.7b435b50-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On 04/19/2012 11:31 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:52:42 +0200 > Lars M=FCller wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >> >> older gcc versions (4.3 in the case of SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 SP 1= and >> SP 2) complain about uninitialized variables in the recent 5.4 relea= se. >> >> The attached patch makes the build process a bit quieter. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Lars >=20 > Looks reasonable if it silences the compiler warnings on older gcc, > even if it's not really a bug per-se. I do wonder if there's some > annotation you can add to silence that warning, but it's probably not > worth worrying about. Yes, annotation is perhaps not worth it. This patch and the other build fixes from Lars looks good to me. Acked-by: Suresh Jayaraman > I'll commit it in the next few days if no one objects...=20