From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:09:06 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] arm: davinci: pdctl next bit position incorrect
In-Reply-To: <4F9042CA.7050305@ti.com>
References: <1334745664-19275-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com>
 <4F8F22D1.8080309@ti.com> <4F8FECD6.6050105@mvista.com>
 <4F9042CA.7050305@ti.com>
Message-ID: <4F917C12.8080306@mvista.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello.

On 04/19/2012 08:52 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:

>>>> The PDCTL NEXT bit is incorrectly set to bit 1 instead of bit 0. This
>>>> patch fixes this issue

>>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@ti.com>

>>> Applying this for v3.5.

>>     But why not to 3.4? It concerns turning on DSP domain on DM644x.

> Yes, but I think as you noted sometime before, no one is really
> depending on kernel to turn on DSP domain on DM644x.

    Looks like you're right (though I don't remember noting it :-).

> Its probably being
> done from U-Boot or ROM code. This is not a v3.4 regression either.

    U-Boot does it only when DSPLINK support is not desired.

> Thanks,
> Sekhar

WBR, Sergei