From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: Update of linux-can-next Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:15:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9501A1.10901@pengutronix.de> References: <4F93C956.5030008@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig70BD524ABB50D7013E26D618" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:43004 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751703Ab2DWHPy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:15:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F93C956.5030008@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig70BD524ABB50D7013E26D618 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/22/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > i created myself a personal clone of linux-can-next for some CAN FD exp= eriments. >=20 > Doing that i thought it should be a good idea to update the linux-can-n= ext > tree, so i did: Yes - good idea. > linux-can-next$ git pull > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git master= >=20 > linux-can-next$ git push As long as you don't have any modifications on your master that's correct= =2E > Now the latest commit from net-next appears here, as expected: >=20 > https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next/commits/master I updated my repo and I see linux-can-next/master is the same as the current net-next/master. So your push worked. > Which is good in the first place :-) >=20 > But i don't see myself in the activities from linux-can-next tree here:= >=20 > https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next >=20 > Did i miss anything? Hmm strange. I basically do the same when pushing updates to linux-can-next. I just deleted an old branch and this shows up in the activities: https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next Maybe there is some kind of privacy option in the profiles? Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --------------enig70BD524ABB50D7013E26D618 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+VAaUACgkQjTAFq1RaXHOuPgCfZu8X2flXToZZIEAIJ3hlaX18 BcUAnRrCFECzMc5eNQ7meq97JO0C2qfy =DZng -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig70BD524ABB50D7013E26D618--