From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Chapman Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] l2tp: misc fixes and add L2TPv3 IP encap over IPv6 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:21:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4F951F13.9060301@katalix.com> References: <1334912573-28804-1-git-send-email-jchapman@katalix.com> <20120422.002933.177233922611577116.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcrl@kvack.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from katalix.com ([82.103.140.233]:34993 "EHLO mail.katalix.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751907Ab2DWJV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:21:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120422.002933.177233922611577116.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 22/04/12 05:29, David Miller wrote: > From: James Chapman > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:02:43 +0100 > >> This patch series includes several L2TP fixes / cleanups and adds >> L2TPv3 IP encapsulation support for IPv6. >> >> Patches 4-10 depend on Benjamin LaHaise's L2TP UDP IPv6 patches which >> have already been submitted for review. Patches 1-3 are not IPv6 >> related so can be reviewed / applied now. > > They aren't in review state, they're in "changed requested" state > because they are obviously broken and need changes since you hit > all of those checksum problems on loopback when you tested it. > > Never submit patch sets against another patch series that is going > to have to go through changes before it goes into the tree. > > I'm dropping this entire set, resubmit after Ben fixes the checksum > problems and does a new submission. Ok. Ben, if I can help with the loopback checksum issue, please let me know. -- James Chapman Katalix Systems Ltd http://www.katalix.com Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development