From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:50:31 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Card AR928X very slow with new kernels In-Reply-To: <4F955D51.2020301@candelatech.com> References: <20120422005427.GA7640@nil> <20120423013957.5007.qmail@stuge.se> <20120423031606.12658.qmail@stuge.se> <4F955D51.2020301@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <4F956C37.8030108@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 04/23/2012 06:46 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 04/22/2012 11:58 PM, Mitch Davis wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>> >>> If you have a kernel that works, and one that doesn't, you can try to >>> bisect and figure out what commit caused it to go bad. >>> >>> I must have deleted your first email..but can you be more specific >>> about what kernel(s) work for you and which ones fail? >> >> That was Pierre, who started this thread. >> >> For me, I have two AR9287 cards in two almost identical laptops. For >> one of them (wife's), the wireless has never worked well. The other >> (mine) has been pretty good. Recently I swapped the wireless cards. >> Mine started giving all sorts of trouble, but the wife's was no >> better. When I upgraded from kernel 3.3.1 to 3.3.2, mine got a whole >> lot better, whereas the wife's didn't. I suspect there are two problems, >> one of which got fixed in 3.3.2. Also, 3.3.1 had a bad ath9k regression, that was fixed in 3.3.2.... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com