From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Crispin Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: fix signed vs unsigned conditional inside pinmux_map_to_setting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:59:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4F957C72.5030604@openwrt.org> References: <1335168743-3868-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <4F957ADA.9000203@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F957ADA.9000203-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Dong Aisheng , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 23/04/12 17:52, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/23/2012 02:12 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> pinmux_map_to_settingi() uses setting->data.mux.func to store the return code of >> pinmux_func_name_to_selector(). However, struct pinctrl_setting_mux defines the >> func element as unsigned, resulting in all error codes getting lost. The >> conditional following the assignment will always evaluate to false thus breaking >> the error path. > This makes sense. > > The exact same issue applies to the assignment to > setting->data.mux.group just a little below. Can you fix that up too please? > missed the group thing, patch coming up ....