From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/tegra: smmu: Add device tree support for SMMU Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:27:28 -0600 Message-ID: <4F959F10.9010908@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1335182340-17237-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1335182340-17237-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1335182340-17237-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hiroshi DOYU Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Joerg Roedel , Thierry Reding , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 04/23/2012 05:58 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > Add device tree support for Tegra30 IOMMU(SMMU). > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c > + err = of_parse_dma_window(dev->of_node, "dma-window", 0, NULL, > + &base, &size); This patch also depends on "dt: Add general DMA window parser" that you sent earlier. > + asids = be32_to_cpup(of_get_property(dev->of_node, "asids", NULL)); > + if (!asids) > + return -ENODEV; What if of_get_property() fails? BTW, does the # ASIDs vary? I wonder if it's worth representing it in the device tree or not. If this driver has a chance of working unmodified on some future chip just by updating this DT property without any code changes, then it seems reasonable to have it in DT.