From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: [snd-usb-audio] frequent "delay: estimated xxx, actual yyy" messages Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:59:15 +0200 Message-ID: <4F96B1B3.1060606@ladisch.de> References: <3172169.OcqrdKakkS@siegfried> <4F9594AF.4090902@linux.intel.com> <1383683.z6YHnxXImd@siegfried> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50E8243B0 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:55:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1383683.z6YHnxXImd@siegfried> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Guillaume Clement Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Guillaume Clement wrote: > Could the delay not be the cause, but a side effect ? Yes, that's probable. It might be possible that some interrupt got delayed too much, or that packets were completed in wrong order. > Do you have any idea why keeping my CPU busy removes the problem ? I'd guess that an idle CPU needs a longer time to wake up. What CPU and what CPU frequency governor are you using? Regards, Clemens