From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Avoid pushing back ModRM byte in decode_opcode()
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:10:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F96B440.1030106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120424003713.57df702ddb13d745466a524c@gmail.com>
On 04/23/2012 06:37 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
>
> Although ModRM byte is read for group decoding, it is soon pushed back
> to make decode_modrm() fetch it later.
>
> We should consistently read it, only once, in decode_opcode() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index e87570e..8729773 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -972,7 +972,6 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> ctxt->modrm_rm = base_reg = (ctxt->rex_prefix & 1) << 3; /* REG.B */
> }
>
> - ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
> ctxt->modrm_mod |= (ctxt->modrm & 0xc0) >> 6;
> ctxt->modrm_reg |= (ctxt->modrm & 0x38) >> 3;
> ctxt->modrm_rm |= (ctxt->modrm & 0x07);
> @@ -3969,6 +3968,7 @@ done:
> * @ctxt: emulation context
> *
> * Decodes opcode bytes and reads opcode from table.
> + * The ModRM byte, if exists, is also fetched into ctxt->modrm.
> *
> * Returns X86EMUL_CONTINUE on success.
> */
> @@ -3977,6 +3977,8 @@ static int decode_opcode(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> int goffset, simd_prefix;
> struct opcode opcode;
> + bool modrm_fetched = false;
> + u64 gtype;
>
> /* Two-byte opcode? */
> if (ctxt->b == 0x0f) {
> @@ -3988,17 +3990,18 @@ static int decode_opcode(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>
> ctxt->d = opcode.flags;
>
> - while (ctxt->d & GroupMask) {
> - switch (ctxt->d & GroupMask) {
> - case Group:
> + while ((gtype = ctxt->d & GroupMask)) {
> + if (!modrm_fetched && gtype != Prefix) {
> ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
> - --ctxt->_eip;
> + modrm_fetched = true;
> + }
> +
> + switch (gtype) {
> + case Group:
> goffset = (ctxt->modrm >> 3) & 7;
> opcode = opcode.u.group[goffset];
> break;
> case GroupDual:
> - ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
> - --ctxt->_eip;
> goffset = (ctxt->modrm >> 3) & 7;
> if ((ctxt->modrm >> 6) == 3)
> opcode = opcode.u.gdual->mod3[goffset];
> @@ -4039,6 +4042,8 @@ static int decode_opcode(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> ctxt->check_perm = opcode.check_perm;
> ctxt->intercept = opcode.intercept;
>
> + if (!modrm_fetched && (ctxt->d & ModRM))
> + ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
Instead of adding yet another conditional, how about doing something like
if ((c->d & ModRM) || (gtype == Group) || (gtype == GroupDual))
ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
somewhere early?
In fact even that is too much. All groups have ModRM somewhere in their
encoding; all we have to do is move it to the main tables (opcode_table
or twobyte_table) and just move the existing modrm fetch before group
parsing.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 15:31 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Split decoder into separate functions Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-23 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Introduce ctxt->op_prefix for 0x66 prefix Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-23 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Make prefix decoding a separate function Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-23 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Make opcode " Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-23 15:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Avoid pushing back ModRM byte in decode_opcode() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-24 14:10 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-04-24 14:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-24 14:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86 emulator: Split decoder into separate functions Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 14:41 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F96B440.1030106@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.