From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes-2 for v3.4 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:32:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4F974625.1030607@samsung.com> References: <4F89A0A5.5030806@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:47000 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744Ab2DYAcl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:32:41 -0400 Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so747603pbb.19 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:32:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Kukjin Kim , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Marek Szyprowski Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, [...] (Cc'ed Marek Szyprowsk) > Looking at your current fixes-3 branch, it's unclear at a quick glance > why the clk_type patch is a bugfix, and especially why it is a > regression fix -- it looks like a cleanup. We're very close to 3.4-rc3 I agree that the removing clk_type member in sdhci platform data should be included in cleanup stuff, it is useless in current mainline though. Marek, is this ok to you? > now, so we should only be merging fixes (and ideally only regressions > since 3.3). > > So, if you do need it to go into 3.4 please motivate it when you send > the pull request. > Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:32:37 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes-2 for v3.4 In-Reply-To: References: <4F89A0A5.5030806@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4F974625.1030607@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, [...] (Cc'ed Marek Szyprowsk) > Looking at your current fixes-3 branch, it's unclear at a quick glance > why the clk_type patch is a bugfix, and especially why it is a > regression fix -- it looks like a cleanup. We're very close to 3.4-rc3 I agree that the removing clk_type member in sdhci platform data should be included in cleanup stuff, it is useless in current mainline though. Marek, is this ok to you? > now, so we should only be merging fixes (and ideally only regressions > since 3.3). > > So, if you do need it to go into 3.4 please motivate it when you send > the pull request. > Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.