From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F97A351.1090505@de.bosch.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:10:09 +0200 From: Dirk Behme MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28 References: <1335323184-11233-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <4F979C91.9020607@de.bosch.com> <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "shawn.guo@linaro.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 25.04.2012 08:51, Huang Shijie wrote: > 于 2012年04月25日 14:41, Dirk Behme 写道: >> Hi Huang Shijie, >> >> On 25.04.2012 05:06, Huang Shijie wrote: >>> The mx6q-arm2 and imx28evk have already support the device tree now. >>> So i decide to add the gpmi-nand dt support to them. >>> >>> The mx23 does not support the device tree now. I will add the gpmi dt >>> support >>> when it is ready. >>> >>> Test this patch set on both MX6Q(arm2) and mx28(evk). >>> >>> v1 --> v2 >>> [1] merge the gpmi/bch device node into one node. >>> [2] add partitions support. >>> [3] misc >>> >>> Huang Shijie (3): >>> mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28 >>> ARM: mx28: add gpmi-nand dt support >>> ARM: mx6q: add gpmi-nand dt support >> For which kernel are these 3 patches? I tried to apply them on top of >> 3.4-rc4 and got a lot of rejects. >> > They are based on 3.4-rc4. but I also applied some mxs-dma patches. > > Which one cause the rejects? Could you kindly try to apply "mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28" on a clean 3.4-rc4? Many thanks Dirk From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:10:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28 In-Reply-To: <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com> References: <1335323184-11233-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <4F979C91.9020607@de.bosch.com> <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com> Message-ID: <4F97A351.1090505@de.bosch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 25.04.2012 08:51, Huang Shijie wrote: > ? 2012?04?25? 14:41, Dirk Behme ??: >> Hi Huang Shijie, >> >> On 25.04.2012 05:06, Huang Shijie wrote: >>> The mx6q-arm2 and imx28evk have already support the device tree now. >>> So i decide to add the gpmi-nand dt support to them. >>> >>> The mx23 does not support the device tree now. I will add the gpmi dt >>> support >>> when it is ready. >>> >>> Test this patch set on both MX6Q(arm2) and mx28(evk). >>> >>> v1 --> v2 >>> [1] merge the gpmi/bch device node into one node. >>> [2] add partitions support. >>> [3] misc >>> >>> Huang Shijie (3): >>> mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28 >>> ARM: mx28: add gpmi-nand dt support >>> ARM: mx6q: add gpmi-nand dt support >> For which kernel are these 3 patches? I tried to apply them on top of >> 3.4-rc4 and got a lot of rejects. >> > They are based on 3.4-rc4. but I also applied some mxs-dma patches. > > Which one cause the rejects? Could you kindly try to apply "mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28" on a clean 3.4-rc4? Many thanks Dirk