From: Kay Diederichs <kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F97AC28.7060609@uni-konstanz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de>
On 04/24/2012 04:46 PM, Daniel Spannbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> at the moment I'm trying to find a bottleneck on my lamp-server with
> opensuse 11.4 (Kernel 2.6.37.6)
>
> Sometimes the system has a very poor performance because of a high io-wait.
> If I watch the systems disk-access with "atop -dD" I can see that sda is
> the most of the time at a load of 10%, sdb sometimes is at 100% or
> higher at the same time.
>
> In my opinion in a Raid1-System both disk should have nearly the same load.
>
> Or may I wrong whis this?
>
> Both harddisks where changed 3 Weeks ago, /proc/mdstat shows that the
> rebuild was successfull and the array is functional. Today I've changed
> th SATA-Cable and the Port on the Maindboard of sdb, but the behaviour
> is still the same. Both disks passed the extended smart-self-test.
>
> Any ideas about that?
>
> Regards
>
> Daniel
Are the disks more or less the same in all SMART attributes (from
smartctl -a)?
I have seen such a behaviour in the case of one disk being marginal,
and/or having a couple of bad spots which need several trials to be
read. This always also resulted in longer "smartctl -t long" times than
usual, but did not always show up clearly in the SMART output (or I
looked at the wrong attributes).
I'd try to exchange the disk.
HTH,
Kay
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 14:46 Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda Daniel Spannbauer
[not found] ` <CABYL=To=tK8a0DVjvYeyuA2K4xChE3hv7Ppx+VvBTYfeZGgsjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-24 15:02 ` Daniel Spannbauer
2012-04-24 15:04 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-24 15:03 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-25 7:47 ` Kay Diederichs [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F97AC28.7060609@uni-konstanz.de \
--to=kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.