diff for duplicates of <4F98EB03.8060903@ti.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7b88e84..8762b18 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ On Tuesday 24 April 2012 11:48 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>>>> [ 154.931335] r6:ffffffff r5:80000010 r4:4005baf0 r3:beaf1f04 >>>>> [ 154.937316] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed21 ]-- >>>>> ->>>>> Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> ->>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> +>>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> +>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> >>> Is this really the correct solution? I do wonder that every driver using >>> runtime PM should enable the clocks on their own. That should be done by >>> the core, @@ -23,5 +23,5 @@ On Tuesday 24 April 2012 11:48 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Will wait for the pm experts to comment. -As far as I know I don’t think that the pm layer doesn't enable the clocks +As far as I know I don?t think that the pm layer doesn't enable the clocks for the drivers on remove. Maybe Kevin or Rajendra can comment better. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 8688199..f64baa3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,19 +3,10 @@ "ref\020120423164944.GE27321@pengutronix.de\0" "ref\04F96ED77.9070503@ti.com\0" "ref\020120424181806.GF9007@pengutronix.de\0" - "ref\020120424181806.GF9007-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCHv8 06/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove\0" + "From\0shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCHv8 06/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove\0" "Date\0Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:58:19 +0530\0" - "To\0Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" - linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> - ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org - tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org - stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - Kevin Hilman <khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> - " Rajendra Nayak <rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tuesday 24 April 2012 11:48 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:\n" @@ -28,8 +19,8 @@ ">>>>> [ 154.931335] r6:ffffffff r5:80000010 r4:4005baf0 r3:beaf1f04\n" ">>>>> [ 154.937316] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed21 ]--\n" ">>>>>\n" - ">>>>> Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>\n" - ">>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\n" + ">>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>\n" + ">>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>\n" ">>> Is this really the correct solution? I do wonder that every driver using\n" ">>> runtime PM should enable the clocks on their own. That should be done by\n" ">>> the core, \n" @@ -43,7 +34,7 @@ ">\n" ">> Will wait for the pm experts to comment.\n" "\n" - "As far as I know I don\342\200\231t think that the pm layer doesn't enable the clocks\n" + "As far as I know I don?t think that the pm layer doesn't enable the clocks\n" for the drivers on remove. Maybe Kevin or Rajendra can comment better. -011f80df05e4da7dc44f9e41fb81ab87edba448ebcfdd4c2f65238be2885f9c4 +df2e7122c2b0a07f23091d1c1782be937d9f31282fbeea03a51bf2ed327f871d
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.