From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from r-finger.com (r-finger.com [178.79.160.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ED3E00596 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host86-133-47-66.range86-133.btcentralplus.com [86.133.47.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72C8F9ADE for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:04:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4F99D47A.9030300@r-finger.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:04:26 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org References: <4F99ABC7.9080807@r-finger.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: egl on beagleboard xM X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:04:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26/04/12 23:40, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 26 apr. 2012, om 22:10 heeft Tomas Frydrych het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to get native egl (i.e., without X) working on Beagleboard >> xM, but without much success. I am using libgles-omap3 (4.05.00.03) the >> kernel(s) and sgx drivers from meta-ti master; everything appears to >> start fine (i.e., no errors reported from pvr-init or dmesg), but trying >> run any of the gles tests / demos gives: >> >> 'eglInitialize' returned egl error 'EGL_BAD_ALLOC' (0x3003) >> >> I have tried both linux-omap 2.6.39 and linux 3.0.8, with same results. > > Both of those aren't the default, so are you actually using meta-ti?!? Hm, so which is meant to be the 'right' beagleboard kernel? The default virtual provider in meta-ti beagleboard.conf is linux-omap, and based on the priorities it seems to work out that 2.6.39 is the preferred version. I am quite happy to try yet a different kernel, of course :) (I am only using the kernel and related recipes from meta-ti.) Tomas