From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: likewhoa Subject: Re: raid10 issues after reorder of boot drives. Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:37:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4F9B57E9.2060409@weboperative.com> References: <4F9AFBC6.7070803@weboperative.com> <4F9B14FA.1090001@weboperative.com> <20120428080522.637bc564@notabene.brown> <4F9B2BE1.5080207@weboperative.com> <4F9B3B48.8020900@weboperative.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F9B3B48.8020900@weboperative.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 04/27/2012 08:35 PM, likewhoa wrote: > I am not sure how to proceed now with the output that shows possible > pairs as it won't allow me to setup all 8 devices on the array but only > 4. Should I run the array creation with -x4 and set the available spare > devicesor or just create the array as I can remember which was one pair > from each controller. i.e /dev/sda3 /dev/sde3 ...? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ok I was able to recreate the array with correct order which I took from my /dev/md0's --details output and was able to decrypt the luks mapping but XFS didn't open and xfs_repair is currently doing the matrix. I will keep this posted with updates. Thanks again Neil. WRT 3.3.3 should I just go back to 3.3.2 which seemed to run fine and wait until there is a release of 3.3.3 that has fix?