From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f176.google.com (mail-iy0-f176.google.com [209.85.210.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7657DE013D1 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iagw33 with SMTP id w33so4420695iag.35 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l+QpCGT+NxyEHmrndT7V7r39+9cnP+vkxGsx0Ir8kFA=; b=vFPkE0S3sqkWyY39OEX2DxhNNOgsJPkTIU+9n+1kEbIIklfIIHxTWQMKxuzm+nP2S2 89TRYwoLsdU1mMJo64gvkTlZtTeH+a2JDDVg/qOB3fRN0RFfH1P++AyvW+zmA88wquJy fH8KzfsO5jRyaGJJSCbs60b5z2uH/llbTAw5gNWewByCKxPfSkmpP3laZQYDB0R2P1TG YK7I5Gmup14XvrVQZXeUxr0+wJjG+zW7CvhVZqa3o6k1kiS2BIaA7egw7MeDg9Fpqqgy Hx2HMVZPwzLwGUVJ9zezho8xrapxMY2N4w7ZXpuELRE25yPGu+kbCXz/lHraWgwGLgDM 75pQ== Received: by 10.50.91.225 with SMTP id ch1mr8250510igb.39.1335722154923; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (S0106586d8f4832af.tb.shawcable.net. [24.109.142.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l9sm25463559iga.6.2012.04.29.10.55.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9D80B1.8060504@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:56:01 -0400 From: Derek Buitenhuis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: poky@yoctoproject.org References: <1325640237-17019-1-git-send-email-derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com> <1327257682-1324-1-git-send-email-derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com> <4F29F010.5030406@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] binutils: Always enable plugins X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:55:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/02/2012 12:04 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > wrote: >> On 22/01/2012 1:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> while this patch is ok. It occurs to me that we might have to find an >>> easier way to specify common options once for all binutils recipes >> >> >> So uh, I am not clear if this patch will be pushed or if you're >> waiting for a refactor of binutils... > > this is ok to go in. cleanup can happen at later times Ping! Resurrecting an old thread! Is this going to be pushed? - Derek