From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C67FE01402 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3UENbjX027869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:23:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4F9EA067.5030806@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:23:35 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Tapp References: <82CCA538-B495-44B3-8E06-F13282FAC541@keylevel.com> In-Reply-To: <82CCA538-B495-44B3-8E06-F13282FAC541@keylevel.com> Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: BSP kernel configuration redefines config options X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:23:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-04-30 10:20 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: > I've got a BSP that has the following kernel configuration linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_mybsp = "mybsp" > KMACHINE_mybsp = "yocto/standard/common-pc/base" > > SRC_URI += " file://defconfig" > > SRCREV_machine_pn-linux-yocto_mybsp ?= "d7e81e7f975c57c581ce13446adf023f95d9fd9f" > SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto_mybsp ?= "d386e09f316e03061c088d2b13a48605c20fb3a6" > > This builds ok, but I get a note that says "There were 43 kernel config options redefined during processing this BSP". I assume this is because the defconfig file is at odds with the kernel I've selected as the base for the BSP. Is it possible to get this note to 'go away' ? Yes, that's exactly what would be triggering it. It's currently not controlled via a flag, since it is technically a value add :) But to make it go away, I'd just suggest overriding do_kernel_configcheck() in your layer. Cheers, Bruce > > I'm running under 6.0.1 and haven't spotted anything in the user manuals that I think would help. > > Chris Tapp > > opensource@keylevel.com > www.keylevel.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto