From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_K=F6nig?= <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Subject: Re: Include request for reset-rework branch.
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:37:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4F9EB1B7.2030308@vodafone.de>
References: <1335797464-14317-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de>
	<CAH3drwatHbcKNM32AAHkTTckAyy9LBE2LDL=TcHE545rEzHh+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH3drwa5kFUyXJ31T7XC1Ux4nJ_rRHxsnPS16UX=4jS5jWVL8A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from outgoing.email.vodafone.de (outgoing.email.vodafone.de
	[139.7.28.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EA49E7C0
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3drwa5kFUyXJ31T7XC1Ux4nJ_rRHxsnPS16UX=4jS5jWVL8A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Cc: airlied@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 30.04.2012 17:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Glisse<j.glisse@gmail.com>  wrot=
e:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Christian K=F6nig
>> <deathsimple@vodafone.de>  wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> if nobody has a last moment concern please include the following patche=
s in drm-next.
>>>
>>> Except for some minor fixes they have already been on the list for quit=
e some time,
>>> but I intentional left out the debugfs related patches cause we haven't=
 finished the
>>> discussion about them yet.
>>>
>>> If you prefer to merge them directly, I also made them available as res=
et-rework
>>> branch here: git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>> I am not completely ok, i am against patch 5. I need sometime to review =
it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jerome
> Sorr mean patch 7
I just started to wonder :) what's wrong with patch 7?

Please keep in mind that implementing proper locking in the lower level =

objects allows us to remove quite some locking in the upper layers.

By the way, do you mind when I dig into the whole locking stuff of the =

kernel driver a bit more? There seems to be allot of possibilities to =

cleanup and simplify the overall driver.

Cheers,
Christian.