From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E60E0030B for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q3UHV6bl004258; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from DFLE71.ent.ti.com (dfle71.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.62]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3UHV6wa014400; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle71.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:31:06 -0500 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3UHV6pD018544; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:31:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4F9ECC59.6070708@ti.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:31:05 -0400 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <266faf71ffdb15e1f6777b520fbe4acaeb26457d.1334784305.git.tom.zanussi@intel.com> <4F9B334D.9060508@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9B334D.9060508@linux.intel.com> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] yocto-bsp: clarify help with reference to meta-intel X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:31:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit nit of nit On 04/27/2012 08:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 04/27/2012 12:00 PM, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote: >> From: Tom Zanussi >> >> + NOTE for x86- and x86_64-based BSPs: The generated BSP assumes the >> + presence of the of the meta-intel layer, so you should also have a >> + meta-intel layer present and added to your bblayers.conf as well. > Consider: > > + NOTE: For x86- and x86_64-based BSPs, the generated BSP assumes the > + presence of the of the meta-intel layer. Ensure the meta-intel layer > + is present and added to bblayers.conf. > Unless I am really mis-reading this I think "presence of the of the" should just be "presence of the"