From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:34:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9FDF69.8090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335876646.6038.101.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 05/01/2012 06:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:12 +0100, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>
>> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism
>> with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. (targeted for 3.5 window)
>
> Which tree is this series going through, tip.git I guess?
>
> I don't see it there.
>
> Ian.
>
Yes you are right.
I am trying to post ticketlock + xen + kvm patches series in one
go. There are some discussions on kvm patches last few days. So I am
putting up all of them together now. I am planning to post within
half/one day.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:34:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9FDF69.8090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335876646.6038.101.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 05/01/2012 06:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:12 +0100, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>
>> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism
>> with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. (targeted for 3.5 window)
>
> Which tree is this series going through, tip.git I guess?
>
> I don't see it there.
>
> Ian.
>
Yes you are right.
I am trying to post ticketlock + xen + kvm patches series in one
go. There are some discussions on kvm patches last few days. So I am
putting up all of them together now. I am planning to post within
half/one day.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 20:12 [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` [PATCH RFC V7 1/12] x86/spinlock: replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` [PATCH RFC V7 2/12] x86/ticketlock: don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:12 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH RFC V7 3/12] x86/ticketlock: collapse a layer of functions Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH RFC V7 4/12] xen: defer spinlock setup until boot CPU setup Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:13 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` [PATCH RFC V7 5/12] xen/pvticketlock: Xen implementation for PV ticket locks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` [PATCH RFC V7 6/12] xen/pvticketlocks: add xen_nopvspin parameter to disable xen pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 7/12] x86/pvticketlock: use callee-save for lock_spinning Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 8/12] x86/pvticketlock: when paravirtualizing ticket locks, increment by 2 Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC V7 9/12] split out rate limiting from jump_label.h Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:15 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC V7 10/12] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` [PATCH RFC V7 11/12] xen/pvticketlock: allow interrupts to be enabled while blocking Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:16 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:17 ` [PATCH RFC V7 12/12] xen: enable PV ticketlocks on HVM Xen Raghavendra K T
2012-04-19 20:17 ` Raghavendra K T
2012-05-01 12:50 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks Ian Campbell
2012-05-01 12:50 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-01 13:04 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2012-05-01 13:04 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F9FDF69.8090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=attilio.rao@citrix.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.