From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: Workings/effectiveness of the xen-acpi-processor
 driver
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:06:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4FA1699A.9070405@amd.com>
References: <4F97F58A.8090409@canonical.com>
	<20120426155033.GE26830@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<4F9976F8.8040502@canonical.com>
	<20120501200207.GA15313@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<4FA06541.7050607@amd.com> <4FA14C2C.5030104@canonical.com>
	<20120502160812.GA6611@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120502160812.GA6611@phenom.dumpdata.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/02/2012 12:08 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index a8f8844..d816448 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -811,7 +811,29 @@ static void xen_io_delay(void)
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>   static u32 xen_apic_read(u32 reg)
>   {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct xen_platform_op op = {
> +		.cmd = XENPF_get_cpuinfo,
> +		.interface_version = XENPF_INTERFACE_VERSION,
> +		.u.pcpu_info.xen_cpuid = 0,


Is this always zero? This will probably solve the current problem but I 
am wondering whether in the future we might hit another bug because this 
routine will return the same APICID for all VCPUs.

-boris


> +	};
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* Shouldn't need this as APIC is turned off for PV, and we only
> +	 * get called on the bootup processor. But just in case. */
> +	if (!xen_initial_domain() || smp_processor_id())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (reg == APIC_LVR)
> +		return 0x10;
> +
> +	if (reg != APIC_ID)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return op.u.pcpu_info.apic_id;
>   }
>
>   static void xen_apic_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
>