From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPh5V-0001E0-GR for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 23:27:53 +0200 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so1403712pbb.6 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 14:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=De5ePvLAJP9bl38Ht/22TcUfORFjnNZTTrWAl1+QCns=; b=JTZDPVM8lDiH++dtpFYDB3jz+jzWW4ag8SyTJm10uSGXsSn9vF63T0dlxfZrQZ43gs Qw7MYv+SSRehKUsB0VHYcZYow3d0tCQtVUKXi4pkkwr8Kf2M8TT6n4eEsQSTKLvoPFgt GXEK1s8ZyRVGbJRCCn4OrlXF5eTZRSazrZor0WWxuhW3Q679b3gPhgyUNySaQuWk9p88 S7oHOx4KggaFHHnWlaUNLoNlCNiEjxJpPNLG+1ZnnEzNxYgtE5Dn2yJNmq8HsrFQObkq kYBP8m4IJZD24dNamCPElm8QHFpKq41SX6aDdulgyVBalkvyetgEk8qGexGYPEjvz6Qt eYOg== Received: by 10.68.227.169 with SMTP id sb9mr776548pbc.157.1335993487996; Wed, 02 May 2012 14:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.23.3.173] (natint3.juniper.net. [66.129.224.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm2996677pbw.57.2012.05.02.14.18.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 May 2012 14:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA1A48A.2040605@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:18:02 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <1335951932-6143-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <1335951932-6143-4-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120502095150.GA3682@jama.jama.net> <788719CB-F74E-4219-85AC-82BE71D2068F@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120502182913.GA4658@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20120502182913.GA4658@jama.jama.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-oe/denzil][PATCH 4/6] gcc-4.5: Match with OE-Core on building procedure for libgcc and gcc-runtime X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:27:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/02/2012 11:29 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:26:49PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> >> Op 2 mei 2012 om 20:14 heeft Khem Raj het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Martin Jansa >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not using gcc-4.5, but aren't those 3 patches only for >>>> master? As gcc-4.7 and other gcc changes were in oe-core only >>>> after release AFAIK. >>>> >>> >>> Yes they are strictly for master to accomodate basic changes in >>> build sequence we did for gcc 4.7 that said, I think now that >>> denzil has released we should reconsider maintaining gcc 4.5 in >>> toolchain-layer and same goes for other recipes in the layer. >>> Infact I feel the whole layer can be dropped. >> >> I was planning to propose the same, any objections? > > I've switched to gcc-4.7, so not from me. good and as Koen is nodding I assume angstrom is fine too. So I think we should drop the layer from master. > > Cheers, > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+hpIoACgkQuwUzVZGdMxR1wwCfep667NaYhcoQKNuyTriVhRz4 FdwAn2sS+BlN0inqL0GsxJInP0CEnsN6 =E6x4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----