All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com>,
	x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] PCI, x86: use RCU list to protect mmconfig list
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:13:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA22208.6070003@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4S9V8fUJcbBHL4CPGzcVW768KiGsALdG78xD85feEvKw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bjorn,
	Thanks for your comments!
	I have thought about using pci_config_lock to serialize
access to the pci_mmcfg_list, but that may hurt MMCFG on x86_64
systems because mmconfig_64.c supports concurrent access to
the MMCFG space without holding the pci_config_lock. So I use
RCU to avoid possible performance penalty for x86_64 systems.

	There are two mechanisms to protect list_add_sorted()
from concurrent updates. The first case is, list_add_sorted()
may be called without holding any lock for serialization at
early booting stages because the system is still in single-threaded
mode. The second case is, pci_config_lock is used to serialize
concurrent modification to the pci_mmcfg_list if list_add_sorted()
is called at runtime.
	The first case is cover by this patch, and the second case
is covered by "[PATCH V2 5/6] PCI, x86: introduce 
pci_mmconfig_insert()/delete() for PCI root bridge hotplug".
	Thanks!

On 2012-5-3 6:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jiang Liu<liuj97@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Use RCU list to protect mmconfig list from dynamic change
>> when supporting PCI host bridge hotplug.
>
> I'm not convinced this is safe.  But I'm not an RCU expert, so maybe
> you can convince me :)
>
> Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt says the update code still requires
> mutual exclusion, and I don't see any in list_add_sorted() or its
> callers.
>
> MMCONFIG accesses are already protected by the pci_config_lock
> spinlock, so I don't think the performance advantages of RCU really
> gain us anything in this situation.
>
> It would definitely be simpler to just hold pci_config_lock while
> updating and searching the pci_mmcfg_list, but if there are issues
> with that, you can educate me about what they are and why this RCU
> code is correct.
>
> Bjorn
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c |   11 ++++++-----
>>   arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c     |   13 +++++++++++--
>>   arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c     |   13 +++++++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> index 5e2cd2a..3bcc361 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>   #include<linux/bitmap.h>
>>   #include<linux/dmi.h>
>>   #include<linux/slab.h>
>> +#include<linux/rculist.h>
>>   #include<asm/e820.h>
>>   #include<asm/pci_x86.h>
>>   #include<asm/acpi.h>
>> @@ -45,20 +46,20 @@ static __init void free_all_mmcfg(void)
>>                 pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
>>   }
>>
>> -static __init void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
>> +static __devinit void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
>>   {
>>         struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
>>
>>         /* keep list sorted by segment and starting bus number */
>> -       list_for_each_entry(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
>> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
>>                 if (cfg->segment>  new->segment ||
>>                     (cfg->segment == new->segment&&
>>                      cfg->start_bus>= new->start_bus)) {
>> -                       list_add_tail(&new->list,&cfg->list);
>> +                       list_add_tail_rcu(&new->list,&cfg->list);
>>                         return;
>>                 }
>>         }
>> -       list_add_tail(&new->list,&pci_mmcfg_list);
>> +       list_add_tail_rcu(&new->list,&pci_mmcfg_list);
>>   }
>>
>>   static __devinit struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_alloc(int segment,
>> @@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_lookup(int segment, int bus)
>>   {
>>         struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
>>
>> -       list_for_each_entry(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list)
>> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg,&pci_mmcfg_list, list)
>>                 if (cfg->segment == segment&&
>>                     cfg->start_bus<= bus&&  bus<= cfg->end_bus)
>>                         return cfg;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c
>> index 5372e86..5dad04a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_32.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>
>>   #include<linux/pci.h>
>>   #include<linux/init.h>
>> +#include<linux/rcupdate.h>
>>   #include<asm/e820.h>
>>   #include<asm/pci_x86.h>
>>   #include<acpi/acpi.h>
>> @@ -60,9 +61,12 @@ err:         *value = -1;
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>>         base = get_base_addr(seg, bus, devfn);
>> -       if (!base)
>> +       if (!base) {
>> +               rcu_read_unlock();
>>                 goto err;
>> +       }
>>
>>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
>>
>> @@ -80,6 +84,7 @@ err:          *value = -1;
>>                 break;
>>         }
>>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -93,9 +98,12 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
>>         if ((bus>  255) || (devfn>  255) || (reg>  4095))
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>>         base = get_base_addr(seg, bus, devfn);
>> -       if (!base)
>> +       if (!base) {
>> +               rcu_read_unlock();
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>>
>>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
>>
>> @@ -113,6 +121,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
>>                 break;
>>         }
>>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
>> index 915a493..acc48c5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include<linux/init.h>
>>   #include<linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include<linux/bitmap.h>
>> +#include<linux/rcupdate.h>
>>   #include<asm/e820.h>
>>   #include<asm/pci_x86.h>
>>
>> @@ -34,9 +35,12 @@ err:         *value = -1;
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>>         addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
>> -       if (!addr)
>> +       if (!addr) {
>> +               rcu_read_unlock();
>>                 goto err;
>> +       }
>>
>>         switch (len) {
>>         case 1:
>> @@ -49,6 +53,7 @@ err:          *value = -1;
>>                 *value = mmio_config_readl(addr + reg);
>>                 break;
>>         }
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -62,9 +67,12 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
>>         if (unlikely((bus>  255) || (devfn>  255) || (reg>  4095)))
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>>         addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn);
>> -       if (!addr)
>> +       if (!addr) {
>> +               rcu_read_unlock();
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>>
>>         switch (len) {
>>         case 1:
>> @@ -77,6 +85,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
>>                 mmio_config_writel(addr + reg, value);
>>                 break;
>>         }
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>
> .
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 16:22 [PATCH V2 0/6] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] PCI, x86: split out pci_mmcfg_check_reserved() for code reuse Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] PCI, x86: split out pci_mmconfig_alloc() " Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] PCI, x86: use RCU list to protect mmconfig list Jiang Liu
2012-05-02 22:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-02 22:31     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-03  6:13     ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-05-03 16:34       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-03 16:34         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-04  2:40         ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] PCI, x86: introduce pci_mmcfg_arch_map()/pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap() Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] PCI, x86: introduce pci_mmconfig_insert()/delete() for PCI root bridge hotplug Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 16:22 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] PCI, ACPI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 18:00   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-09 18:00     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10  6:26     ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA22208.6070003@huawei.com \
    --to=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chenkeping@huawei.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.