From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Kinzler <ml-xen-devel@hfp.de>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 12:43:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4FA2615C.1000301@hfp.de>
References: <4FA1328B.6070602@hfp.de>
	<1335965470.26758.58.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1335965470.26758.58.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 02.05.2012 15:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Did you happen to also compare 3.2.12 and 2.6.34.10 running these
> workloads natively?

Yes, I tested against 2.6.32.x. Differences exist, but are minor.

time emerge apache:

		2.6.32.36	3.2.12		3.3.4
	real    0m31.419s	0m34.770s	0m35.210s
	user    0m45.479s	0m38.994s	0m39.750s
	sys     0m6.488s	0m4.584s	0m4.928s

make -j4:

		2.6.32.36	3.2.12		3.3.4
	real    2m3.531s	2m4.423s	2m2.348s
	user    7m45.817s	7m21.456s	7m18.291s
	sys     0m35.194s	0m28.758s	0m28.974s

Regards Andreas