From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Jana Saout <jana@saout.de>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops with DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS and ocfs2, autofs4
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:27:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA2CDFC.6070901@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxrBghonjRvS=KK=5Oqw_Wj9PDh2wkDtVh7U9jw8=uTsA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/03/2012 11:23 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I left the instruction suffixes in place, although Peter is probably
> right that the assembler will do the right thing.
>
Yes, and we have <asm/asm.h> for the case where it doesn't (where there
is only a memory operand, for example.) I tend to put the suffixes in
even if they are redundant, but we already rely on the unsuffixed
instructions working in many, many places.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 12:27 Oops with DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS and ocfs2, autofs4 Jana Saout
2012-05-01 11:00 ` Joel Becker
2012-05-01 12:28 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 5:02 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 5:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 5:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 6:23 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 6:26 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-03 6:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 6:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 6:54 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 6:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 7:02 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 6:47 ` Al Viro
2012-05-03 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 17:30 ` Al Viro
2012-05-03 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-05-03 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 18:48 ` David Miller
2012-05-03 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-03 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 20:30 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 21:03 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-03 21:47 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-04 11:21 ` Jana Saout
2012-05-03 8:01 ` Jana Saout
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA2CDFC.6070901@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jana@saout.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.