From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4FA3414B.3050302@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:39:07 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28 References: <1335939209-15625-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120502144008.GF2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1336042485.13013.41.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FA33B7A.3040504@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Huang Shijie , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , =E4=BA=8E 2012=E5=B9=B405=E6=9C=8804=E6=97=A5 10:28, Shawn Guo =E5=86=99=E9= =81=93: > On 4 May 2012 10:14, Huang Shijie wrote: >> The mxs-dma is another driver (just as the pinctrl driver). I think it= 's >> better to do the job in parallel. >> > The problem is if the patch gets applied on mtd tree as it is, the > gpmi-nand will stop functioning on mtd tree. Or you are fine with even this patch is get applied. the gpmi-nand still can not work. I still have to add the pinctl patch to it. So it have no difference on whether=20 the mxs-dma driver is ready or not. :) So let it go in parallel. Best Regards Huang Shijie > that, since no in-tree board support is using the driver so far? If > you are fine with that, I'm fine too. > > Regards, > Shawn > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie) Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:39:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3] mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28 In-Reply-To: References: <1335939209-15625-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120502144008.GF2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1336042485.13013.41.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FA33B7A.3040504@freescale.com> Message-ID: <4FA3414B.3050302@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? 2012?05?04? 10:28, Shawn Guo ??: > On 4 May 2012 10:14, Huang Shijie wrote: >> The mxs-dma is another driver (just as the pinctrl driver). I think it's >> better to do the job in parallel. >> > The problem is if the patch gets applied on mtd tree as it is, the > gpmi-nand will stop functioning on mtd tree. Or you are fine with even this patch is get applied. the gpmi-nand still can not work. I still have to add the pinctl patch to it. So it have no difference on whether the mxs-dma driver is ready or not. :) So let it go in parallel. Best Regards Huang Shijie > that, since no in-tree board support is using the driver so far? If > you are fine with that, I'm fine too. > > Regards, > Shawn >