From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4FA35B73.8080008@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:30:43 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subodh Nijsure Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: gpmi: add device tree support to gpmi-nand References: <1336101182-5200-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <4FA34EAD.1010302@grid-net.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA34EAD.1010302@grid-net.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shawn.guo@linaro.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > Any chance you can add some information on what kind of mtd tests were > done with this code change and on what platform? I did bonnie++ test, and mtd_speed test on mx28evk board. > > Also if one wanted to test this patch say on mx28 based hardware, one > should apply this patch against arm-soc tree, top of the 3.5-next tree? If you only want to test this on mx28 based hardware, you can just apply this patch against the arm-soc tree, top of the 3.5-next tree. But you still need some extra mxs-dma patches (and maybe do some hardcode for pinctl) to make the gpmi-nand driver work. Best Regards Huang Shijie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie) Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:30:43 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: gpmi: add device tree support to gpmi-nand In-Reply-To: <4FA34EAD.1010302@grid-net.com> References: <1336101182-5200-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <4FA34EAD.1010302@grid-net.com> Message-ID: <4FA35B73.8080008@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, > Any chance you can add some information on what kind of mtd tests were > done with this code change and on what platform? I did bonnie++ test, and mtd_speed test on mx28evk board. > > Also if one wanted to test this patch say on mx28 based hardware, one > should apply this patch against arm-soc tree, top of the 3.5-next tree? If you only want to test this on mx28 based hardware, you can just apply this patch against the arm-soc tree, top of the 3.5-next tree. But you still need some extra mxs-dma patches (and maybe do some hardcode for pinctl) to make the gpmi-nand driver work. Best Regards Huang Shijie