From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQJ98-0005SD-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 10:06:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQJ91-00049F-D5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 10:06:09 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.111]:54740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQJ90-00048T-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 10:06:03 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 4 May 2012 15:06:00 +0100 Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q44E5u592584656 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 15:05:56 +0100 Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q44E5S22014661 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:05:28 -0600 Message-ID: <4FA3E21B.5030303@de.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:05:15 +0200 From: Christian Borntraeger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EC02384-64EF-4514-975C-A3D229B3693E@suse.de> <1336055277-53204-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix size checking in load_image_targphys to accept max_size > INT_MAX List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , agraf@suse.de, QEMU Developers >> Since load_image_targphys is declared as taking an int for max_sz, this will >> fail for ram sizes > INT_MAX. >> Lets change the max_sz parameter to a uint64_t. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > > A patch equivalent to this has already been submitted: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/146165/ > We should be applying that one, it has already been reviewed. Right. > > Anthony? AFAIK Anthony is on holiday. It would be good, if we could have that before 1.1, so shall we wait or are there other maintainers willing to accept that patch? Christian