From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJRR-0001aJ-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:37:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJRQ-0006AJ-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:37:13 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:47905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJRP-0006A9-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:37:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4FA789B4.4050002@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:37:08 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FA6CB05.3060004@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4FA76682.7090004@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20120507074501.GG15960@redhat.com> <4FA7816B.8090107@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20120507080651.GH15960@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120507080651.GH15960@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] current qemu git does not work with win7 guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: qemu-devel On 07.05.2012 12:06, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:01:47PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> I'm trying. But the problem is that right now I'm swamped >> with other work. So far win7 x64 appears to work, it >> reboots without showing this "stop" thing or other issues, >> even with 32bit qemu userspace. >> > Sorry, didn't make myself clear. I mean 32bit version of host > kernel/qemu just to rule 32bitness out. Yet I now know that win64 is okay with current qemu ;) I'll try 64bit version of qemu later today. >> Hmm. I've seen something has been mentioned about seabios and >> borken 32 bit winXP guest due to some 64bit patch, just today... >> Lemme check... >> > The patch is not in any released version as far as I see. Are you using > Seabios upstream? No, I use whatever comes with qemu itself. The thing just reminded about something very similar mentioned recently, and I wanted to check. And indeed, it is someting not relevant to this context. Thanks, /mjt > > -- > Gleb.