From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>,
"linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"williams@redhat.com" <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: incorrect first latency value for --verbose option
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:45:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA8428B.4050809@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205072322250.3886@tycho>
On 05/07/12 14:41, John Kacur wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2012, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>>
>> When the --verbose option is selected, the first value for each thread is
>> incorrectly reported as zero.
>>
>> This is because when collecting the first value, the index into stat->values is
>> incremented from zero to one before storing the value. But when printing the
>> values, the first value printed is stat->values[0], which has been initialized
>> to zero.
>
> Hi Frank
>
> Ok, no more posting from me after winning a bottle of whiskey at the Irish
> Pub on quiz night. :)
Or if you do, you should share a bit of the whiskey with me.
>
> I've been looking at this one, and I'm not sure about it.
> According to the help output,
>
> "-v --verbose output values on stdout for statistics
> format: n:c:v n=tasknum c=count v=value in us"
>
> ./cyclictest --verbose -p99 -t | awk '$2~/^0/{ print }'
>
> 0: 0: 0
> 1: 0: 0
> 2: 0: 0
> 3: 0: 0
> 4: 0: 0
> 5: 0: 0
> 6: 0: 0
> 7: 0: 0
>
> So, it looks like the values are 0 at count 0, doesn't that make sense?
Nope. The event for count == 0 is the first event. And the first event
has an actual latency that is not zero on the system I tested it on.
-Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 0:02 [PATCH] rt-tests: incorrect first latency value for --verbose option Frank Rowand
2012-05-07 21:41 ` John Kacur
2012-05-07 21:45 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2012-05-07 22:03 ` John Kacur
2012-05-07 22:13 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA8428B.4050809@am.sony.com \
--to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.