From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:05:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4FA8470D.9050204@am.sony.com>
References: <4FA841B4.20701@am.sony.com> <4FA842F3.60204@am.sony.com>
Reply-To: <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "jkacur@redhat.com" <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"williams@redhat.com" <williams@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ch1ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.182]:46113
	"EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753340Ab2EGWF0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 May 2012 18:05:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4FA842F3.60204@am.sony.com>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>

Darn it, the subject should have been:

  [PATCH 2/2] RFC cyclictest: report large measured clock latency