Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] perf, tool: Fix endian issues

[David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>]

On 5/7/12 5:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Tested by running following usecase:
>    - origin system:
>      # perf record -a -- sleep 10 (any perf record will do)
>      # perf report>  report.origin
>      # perf archive perf.data
>
>    - copy the perf.data, report.origin and perf.data.tar.bz2
>      to a target system and run:
>      # tar xjvf perf.data.tar.bz2 -C ~/.debug
>      # perf report>  report.target
>      # diff -u report.origin report.target
>
>    - the diff should produce no output
>      (besides some white space stuff and possibly different
>       date/TZ output)
>
> Tested by above usecase cross following architectures:
>    i386, x86_64, s390x, ppc64

What version of ppc64? I'm getting 2 compile failures using Fedora 12 
PPC, 32-bit. I sent a patch for the easy one with perf-report. I'm a bit 
stumped on this one:

     LINK /tmp/pbuild/perf
/tmp/pbuild/libperf.a(pmu.o): In function `pmu_format_parse':
/mnt/src/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:47: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_in'
/mnt/src/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:47: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_in'
/tmp/pbuild/libperf.a(pmu-bison.o): In function `perf_pmu_parse':
/tmp/pbuild/util/pmu-bison.c:1287: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_lex'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [/tmp/pbuild/perf] Error 1

David