From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSFV2-0000ns-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:36:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSFV0-0004xF-62 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:36:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAAF17B.6090801@suse.de> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 00:36:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FAAEC41.70608@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAAEC41.70608@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1] Switch SIG_IPI to SIGUSR1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Am 10.05.2012 00:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > Use SIGUSR1 unconditionally as SIG_IPI. First, ucontext coroutines tend > to corrupt RT signal masks due to a 32-on-64-bit Linux kernel bug. And, > second, there appears to be no advantage in using RT signals for VCPU > kicking. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > --- [...] > This is also stable material. Please cc qemu-stable then. When omitting that in the original patch submission, stable maintainers won't notice when the patch gets a "Thanks, applied" reply. /-F --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg