diff for duplicates of <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 6c94f61..c736869 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,19 +1,15 @@ -Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : +Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : > On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote: ->> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel = -boards. +>> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards. >> Since last version, here is what changed: ->> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to ch= -ange to IIO +>> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO >> kfifo buffer along the way. >> * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews >> * Made various fixes according to reviews >> * Support for X5 boards ->=20 -> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that dr= -iver? -> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses thi= -s +> +> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver? +> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this > device boots using the device tree? Mostly historical actually. @@ -26,7 +22,7 @@ I'll send an updated version. Maxime ---=20 +-- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 1b858af..77fa43b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,33 +1,23 @@ "ref\01336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com\0" "ref\0201205091440.14587.arnd@arndb.de\0" - "From\0Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards\0" + "From\0maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards\0" "Date\0Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:41 +0200\0" - "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" - "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" - linux-iio@vger.kernel.org - thomas@free-electrons.com - nicolas.ferre@atmel.com - plagnioj@jcrosoft.com - " patrice.vilchez@atmel.com\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit :\n" + "Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :\n" "> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote:\n" - ">> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel =\n" - "boards.\n" + ">> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards.\n" ">> Since last version, here is what changed:\n" - ">> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to ch=\n" - "ange to IIO\n" + ">> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO\n" ">> kfifo buffer along the way.\n" ">> * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews\n" ">> * Made various fixes according to reviews\n" ">> * Support for X5 boards\n" - ">=20\n" - "> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that dr=\n" - "iver?\n" - "> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses thi=\n" - "s\n" + "> \n" + "> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver?\n" + "> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this\n" "> device boots using the device tree?\n" "\n" "Mostly historical actually.\n" @@ -40,10 +30,10 @@ "\n" "Maxime\n" "\n" - "--=20\n" + "-- \n" "Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons\n" "Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux\n" "development, consulting, training and support.\n" http://free-electrons.com -b1650ccbe124eee1f1080538947b10f077607def7ecb16f8a44a4d54054f3d25 +cf60b0cbe0551a77dec3a6cb65bc19f3146e06f95394c611190dc991621b22d5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.