diff for duplicates of <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index cde3481..ffc3509 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,36 +1,29 @@ On 05/10/2012 10:32 AM, Maxime Ripard : -> Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit : +> Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : >> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote: ->>> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel= - boards. +>>> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards. >>> Since last version, here is what changed: ->>> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to c= -hange to IIO +>>> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO >>> kfifo buffer along the way. >>> * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews >>> * Made various fixes according to reviews >>> * Support for X5 boards >> ->> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that d= -river? ->> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses th= -is +>> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver? +>> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this >> device boots using the device tree? ->=20 +> > Mostly historical actually. -> The first versions were made using only non-DT probing, and then DT w= -as +> The first versions were made using only non-DT probing, and then DT was > added, so I didn't remove it. -> I've no strong feeling about this however, I believe we can definitel= -y +> I've no strong feeling about this however, I believe we can definitely > drop it, moreover if it makes life easier for you to merge it. ->=20 +> > I'll send an updated version. Hold on Maxime, -Non-DT is important for us as several boards are not converted to DT an= -d +Non-DT is important for us as several boards are not converted to DT and I guess that some never will. Moreover, some AT91 SoC will certainly never be converted to DT but all are equipped with ADC... @@ -42,5 +35,5 @@ Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. Best regards, ---=20 +-- Nicolas Ferre diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 365ba52..9b2847f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,51 +1,38 @@ "ref\01336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com\0" "ref\0201205091440.14587.arnd@arndb.de\0" "ref\04FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com\0" - "From\0Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards\0" + "From\0nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards\0" "Date\0Thu, 10 May 2012 10:50:34 +0200\0" - "To\0Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>" - " Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" - "Cc\0<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>" - <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org> - <thomas@free-electrons.com> - <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> - " <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 05/10/2012 10:32 AM, Maxime Ripard :\n" - "> Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a =E9crit :\n" + "> Le 09/05/2012 16:40, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :\n" ">> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote:\n" - ">>> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel=\n" - " boards.\n" + ">>> Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards.\n" ">>> Since last version, here is what changed:\n" - ">>> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to c=\n" - "hange to IIO\n" + ">>> * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO\n" ">>> kfifo buffer along the way.\n" ">>> * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews\n" ">>> * Made various fixes according to reviews\n" ">>> * Support for X5 boards\n" ">>\n" - ">> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that d=\n" - "river?\n" - ">> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses th=\n" - "is\n" + ">> What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver?\n" + ">> Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this\n" ">> device boots using the device tree?\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Mostly historical actually.\n" - "> The first versions were made using only non-DT probing, and then DT w=\n" - "as\n" + "> The first versions were made using only non-DT probing, and then DT was\n" "> added, so I didn't remove it.\n" - "> I've no strong feeling about this however, I believe we can definitel=\n" - "y\n" + "> I've no strong feeling about this however, I believe we can definitely\n" "> drop it, moreover if it makes life easier for you to merge it.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> I'll send an updated version.\n" "\n" "Hold on Maxime,\n" "\n" - "Non-DT is important for us as several boards are not converted to DT an=\n" - "d\n" + "Non-DT is important for us as several boards are not converted to DT and\n" "I guess that some never will. Moreover, some AT91 SoC will certainly\n" "never be converted to DT but all are equipped with ADC...\n" "\n" @@ -57,7 +44,7 @@ "but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver.\n" "\n" "Best regards,\n" - "--=20\n" + "-- \n" Nicolas Ferre -a6dd0efa6aa3298e72955268a1e6159d6ced5c0bf4ef8bcab4b46788a1777d10 +3239d5c5c0eab9a6f38da142efebcd86a2082df22e6e2dca27f9f58235741119
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.