From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSYqV-0000Sc-Qz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:16:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSYqQ-0005Ex-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:16:15 -0400 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:23919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSYqP-0005DN-MV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:16:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4FAC13F1.1070902@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:16:01 -0300 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120510185845.GK14647@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120510185845.GK14647@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] msi: Refactorings and reset List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Isaku Yamahata , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel , Alexander Graf On 2012-05-10 15:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:22:11PM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> These patches had been sent before. I now rebased them and reduced them >> to a set that has a value independent of the ongoing MSI rework for KVM >> integration. >> >> I'm not yet sure if patch 1&2 should be considered for 1.1 as they >> implicitly fix the missing msi_reset for intel-hda and ahci. An >> alternative could be to add those reset calls the classic way and leave >> the refactoring for post-1.1. Maybe Gerd and Alex can comment on this. > > I'd prefer that for 1.1, core changes are an unnecessary risk for 1.1. OK, I will fix this first and base the rest of this series on top. Then we can pull the fixes into 1.1 and stable. XHCI is broken as well, BTW. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux