From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:20:41 +1000 Subject: [GIT PULL] ep93xx cleanups for 3.5 In-Reply-To: References: <4FAC6389.40607@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4FACAFB9.7000506@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/05/12 16:18, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote: >> The following changes since commit 0034102808e0dbbf3a2394b82b1bb40b5778de9e: >> >> Linux 3.4-rc2 (2012-04-07 18:30:41 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/RyanMallon/linux-ep93xx.git tags/ep93xx-cleanup-for-3.5 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to a1eacd79a602707f97201edbac9a03edaaea1847: >> >> arm: ep93xx: use gpio_led_register_device (2012-04-12 09:38:15 +1000) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> H Hartley Sweeten (2): >> arm: ep93xx: use DEFINE_RES_* macros >> arm: ep93xx: use gpio_led_register_device >> >> Ryan Mallon (1): >> Fix build breakage in ep93xx-core > > Pulled, thanks. > > One^WTwo nits: please use the format 'ARM: ep93xx: <...>' on these > kind of commits in the future. Also, since you have the commit that > introduces the error right before, you can squash it in with the > bugfix (and document it in the signed-off-by sequence if you prefer -- > see SubmittingPatches for examples). Thanks, The reason I didn't squash the patches together was that I had already pushed the original broken commit out. I'm still a bit unclear on how to fix things on a public stable branch once it has been pushed. I'll make sure that all patches have the correct subject headers in future. ~Ryan