From: theo borm <theo_mlmmj@borm.org>
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org
Subject: Re: [mlmmj] mlmmj and spf
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:55:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD1A6B.5010806@borm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FACFAE7.60904@borm.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2216 bytes --]
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the answer.
On 05/11/2012 02:43 PM, Christian Laursen wrote:
> On 05/11/12 13:41, theo borm wrote:
> >
>> We operate a small, closed, moderated mailing list that recently stopped
>> working for a large part of its subscribers. The organization of which
>> these subscribers are a member maintains an SPF record which denies
>> access to all servers except a named few, which seems to be the cause of
>> these problems.
>
> It sounds like their SPF implementation is broken.
microsoft?
>
>> As a work-around I set mlmmj to use a different from address in the
>> "From:" header. This solution is, however, plainly bad as it removes the
>> original sender from the headers. I have seen other lists use "Sender:"
>> header, but results are a mixed bag. With strict SPF checking of the
>> "From:" header in place these mails also don't pass.
>
> SPF checking should be done on the enevelope FROM address, not the
> From: header contained inside the mail.
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID summarizes this nicely:
<quote>
How will /Sender ID/ implementations violating the /SPF/ specification
affect me?
If you have published an |v=spf1| policy to protect the use of your
domain in the MAIL FROM and HELO addresses, /Sender ID/ implementations
that apply your policy to /PRA/ (per RFC 4406) will reject your mail if
you use your domain in the "|From|" (or generally /PRA/) header field
while sending from (MAIL FROM) another system.
</quote>
organization has an |v=spf1| policy in place. Mail is outsourced to
microsoft, which uses sender ID.
It's the receiving server which has to implement spf/sender-ID, so
delivery is erratic to say the least.
>
> When mlmmj send out mails to the list subscribers the envelope from
> looks something like this:
> listname+bounces-XXXX-recipient=example.com@listowner.tld
listowner.tld doesn't have an spf record.
this is not the problem. problem is the "From" field/
>
> So the SPF checking is done against the domain that the list is
> running on.
>
> The correct cause of action would be to get the organization with
> broken SPF checking to fix that.
>
I (and others) have told them a few times to no avail.
regards, Theo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3391 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 11:41 [mlmmj] mlmmj and spf theo borm
2012-05-11 11:54 ` Franky Van Liedekerke
2012-05-11 12:42 ` theo borm
2012-05-11 12:43 ` Christian Laursen
2012-05-11 13:20 ` Ben Schmidt
2012-05-11 13:42 ` Franky Van Liedekerke
2012-05-11 13:51 ` theo borm
2012-05-11 13:55 ` theo borm [this message]
2012-05-11 13:56 ` Franky Van Liedekerke
2012-05-11 13:57 ` theo borm
2012-05-11 14:33 ` theo borm
2012-05-11 14:50 ` Ben Schmidt
2012-05-11 14:56 ` Ben Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAD1A6B.5010806@borm.org \
--to=theo_mlmmj@borm.org \
--cc=mlmmj@mlmmj.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.