From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: mpu3050: set IRQF_ONESHOT when requesting the interrupt Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:29:44 -0600 Message-ID: <4FAD5A98.3070009@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1335894406-27428-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20120509052301.GB10514@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4FAAC6FB.2010308@wwwdotorg.org> <20120511072921.GA16664@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:39489 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758848Ab2EKS3r (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 14:29:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120511072921.GA16664@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren , Alan Cox On 05/11/2012 01:29 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:35:23PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/08/2012 11:23 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:46:46AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> From: Stephen Warren >>>> >>>> Commit 1c6c695 "genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests" requires >>>> that request_threaded_irq() either be passed an explicit handler, or >>>> that IRQF_ONESHOT be set. Set this flag. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren >>> >>> Applied, thank you. >>> >>> BTW, since it appears you have the hardware any chance you could try the >>> patch below? I had it in my queue for a while but Alan disappeared and >>> I didn't have anyone to test it. >> >> I tested the patch with an interrupt supplied, and still see periodic >> output from evbug that appears to correlate with when I move the board. >> >> I'm not sure how to test it in polled mode. What application would I use >> to trigger the polling? evtest just seems to print out the initial >> values, but not poll. > > Then there is a problem with the patch; once someone (i.e. evtest) opens > input device kernel should start polling at givein interval... > > I think I know what might be wrong. We need to make sure we are calling > runtime PM APIs instead of trying to wake up chip directly because > parent might be sleeping as well. > > Does the version below work any better? Yes, but there's still one issue. Case 1: CONFIG_INPUT_MPU3050_POLLED_MODE=n IRQ supplied to driver Works Case 2: CONFIG_INPUT_MPU3050_POLLED_MODE=y IRQ supplied to driver Fails; no output from evtest Case 2: CONFIG_INPUT_MPU3050_POLLED_MODE=y IRQ NOT supplied to driver Works