From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA57E00746 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2012 15:55:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="142955259" Received: from rkern1-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO envy.home) ([10.7.199.157]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2012 15:55:26 -0700 Message-ID: <4FAD98B1.2020308@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:54:41 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Zanussi References: <594ba05ab96a837575960ba514ae153eeef899b7.1336697506.git.tom.zanussi@intel.com> <0a78d7e8401e3d500b3cb784c6bf0a4e7271f99e.1336697506.git.tom.zanussi@intel.com> <4FAD3BC9.1030606@linux.intel.com> <1336774104.27950.13.camel@elmorro> <4FAD9442.5040105@linux.intel.com> <1336776169.27950.17.camel@elmorro> In-Reply-To: <1336776169.27950.17.camel@elmorro> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] meta/crownbay: factor out policy-related options X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:55:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/11/2012 03:42 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 15:35 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> On 05/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> >>>> Independent from this patch, but does crownbay have all three? ehci and >>>> ohci seems a lot more likely to me. >>>> >>> >>> lsusb shows ehci and ohci, but why did you think ohci would be more >>> likely? >>> >>> Tom >> >> >> I believe UHCI is only seen on non-intel platforms, primarily AMD and >> maybe VIA systems... just something I had a vague recollection of. >> > > I thought it was the opposite, but was probably thrown off by emenlow > which has UHCI... │ Symbol: USB_UHCI_HCD [=y] │ │ Type : tristate │ │ Prompt: UHCI HCD (most Intel and VIA) support │ │ Defined at drivers/usb/host/Kconfig:444 │ │ Depends on: USB_SUPPORT [=y] && USB [=y] && (PCI [=y] || SPARC_LEON) │ │ Location: │ │ -> Device Drivers │ │ -> USB support (USB_SUPPORT [=y]) And I see lots of ARM OHCI bits... so maybe you're right. But for the EG20T, as you pointed out, it seems to be EHCI and OHCI for whatever reason. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel