From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2764488726724340596=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only
 libnl-3.0 is installed
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 15:05:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4FAEDEC7.3020309@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: alpine.LNX.2.01.1205122353410.19371@frira.vanv.qr
To: powertop@lists.01.org
List-ID: <powertop@lists.01.org>

--===============2764488726724340596==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> =

> (Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)

as long as latest Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu have the current one, I
wouldn't mind just ditching support for the old ones...

--===============2764488726724340596==--