From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754446Ab2ENIJH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 04:09:07 -0400 Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.5]:59797 "EHLO e28smtp05.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754233Ab2ENIJD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2012 04:09:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB0BD92.5030202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:08:50 +0800 From: Michael Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Ingo Molnar , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , Ram Pai , LKML Subject: About dynamic schedule domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12051408-8256-0000-0000-0000026DA6B5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Peter I have read the mail thread on the topic about dynamic sched domain in link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130822782111533&w=2 But I'm not sure, is the dynamical sched domain means we can change the sched domain at running time through proc or something else? If it is still pending on implementation, could you please tell me how things going on and what's the idea you have mentioned in the mail? I want to do some help if I could :) Regards, Michael Wang