From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2046748342106491942=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Chris Ferron <chris.e.ferron at linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only
 libnl-3.0 is installed
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:48:04 -0700
Message-ID: <4FB14554.2000109@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: alpine.LNX.2.01.1205130038130.19793@frira.vanv.qr
To: powertop@lists.01.org
List-ID: <powertop@lists.01.org>

--===============2046748342106491942==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05/12/2012 03:38 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2012-05-13 00:05, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>>> (Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)
>> as long as latest Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu have the current one
> They do
Can't ditch the old ones as they are still used by older distributions.
> _______________________________________________
> PowerTop mailing list
> PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop


--===============2046748342106491942==--