From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: Linux 3.4-rc7 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 00:15:17 +0530 Message-ID: <4FB2A43D.7090005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4FB011E7.1000604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FB0197F.6010000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FB2A090.6060404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: John David Anglin , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Mikulas Patocka , stepanm@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, deller@gmx.de, dhowells@redhat.com, yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, eike-kernel@sf-tec.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2012 12:12 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat > wrote: >>> >>> Can somebody send the final patches with proper subject lines etc, >>> instead of hiding them in unrelated threads? I hate picking up patches >>> that I don't personally know from the middle of some random thread. >>> >> >> >> Okay, here they are: > > What part of "with proper subject lines" didn't you get? > > Look at the subject line. Look at how you put the patch in the middle > of an old thread that was about something totally different. > > This was *exactly* what I complained about. I don't want patches like this. > Oops! Sorry about that! I will resend in a separate thread with appropriate subject line. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat