Re: [RFC] SL[AUO]B common code 8/9] slabs: list addition move to slab_common

[Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>]

On 05/15/2012 12:15 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Move the code to append the new kmem_cache to the list of slab caches to
> the kmem_cache_create code in the shared code.
>
> This is possible now since the acquisition of the mutex was moved into
> kmem_cache_create().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter<cl@linux.com>
>
>
> ---
>   mm/slab.c        |    7 +++++--
>   mm/slab_common.c |    3 +++
>   mm/slub.c        |    2 --
>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab_common.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab_common.c	2012-05-14 08:39:27.859145830 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slab_common.c	2012-05-14 08:39:29.827145790 -0500
> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con
>
>   	s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
>
> +	if (s&&  s->refcount == 1)
> +		list_add(&s->list,&slab_caches);
> +
>   oops:

I personally think that the refcount == 1 test is too fragile.
It happens to be true, and is likely to be true in the future, but there 
is no particular reason that is *has* to be true forever.

Also, the only reasons it exists, seems to be to go around the fact that 
the slab already adds the kmalloc caches to a list in a slightly 
different way. And there has to be cleaner ways to achieve that.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>