On 05/16/2012 11:04 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:

>>> +- "value": cache size in bytes (json-int)
>>
>> Would it be any easier to take 'order' (log2 of the size) instead of the
>> actual cache size?  That is, instead of calling "value":1048576, I would
>> rather type "value":20.
> Well the user is considering how much memory is going to be used and I though that it
> is simpler to use 1G than 30.

Libvirt can cope with either style, so maybe it's worth waiting for
anyone else to chime in on which style is easier.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org