Hi Jens, On 05/16/2012 06:18 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: > On 16.05.2012 17:45, Ronald Tessier wrote: >> Hi Jens, > > Hi Ronald, > >> On 05/16/2012 04:03 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: >>> From: Jens Rehsack >>> >>> --- >>> src/wsputil.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 Datei geändert, 6 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/src/wsputil.c b/src/wsputil.c >>> index 1b2b2b7..c4c9d62 100644 >>> --- a/src/wsputil.c >>> +++ b/src/wsputil.c >>> @@ -496,6 +496,12 @@ gboolean wsp_decode_application_id(struct >>> wsp_header_iter *iter, >>> */ >>> if (wsp_header_iter_get_val_type(iter) == WSP_VALUE_TYPE_SHORT) { >>> val = *pdu_val& 0x7f; >>> + } else if (wsp_header_iter_get_val_type(iter) == >>> WSP_VALUE_TYPE_TEXT) { >>> + val_len = wsp_header_iter_get_val_len(iter); >>> + val = -1; >>> + >>> + if (out_value) >>> + *out_value = pdu_val; >>> } else { >>> val_len = wsp_header_iter_get_val_len(iter); >>> >> >> Unless I miss something, if the application_id is given as TEXT (in the >> pdu) the *out_value will always be NULL (it will be set to the result of >> get_text_entry()). >> >> I think you don't need to set val_len and val, you can just return TRUE >> after doing *out_value = pdu_val. > > Probably. Do you want me to act on this and submit a new version (not > before Monday - commuting now) or will you fix it on your own? > Indeed it can easily wait until Monday ... Please, submit a new version of your patch to be reviewed by a maintainer. Best regards, Ronald