All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Kinzler <ml-xen-devel@hfp.de>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:39:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB67B5C.9070003@hfp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336042317.20716.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 03.05.2012 12:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:43 +0100, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
>> On 02.05.2012 15:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Did you happen to also compare 3.2.12 and 2.6.34.10 running these
>>> workloads natively?
>> Yes, I tested against 2.6.32.x. Differences exist, but are minor.
>
> Good to know, thanks for testing
>
> The other potential Xen perf thing which just occurred to to me is the
> ACPI power management stuff which the xen-acpi-processor patches in
> 3.4-rcN are fixing. These are necessary to enable things like turbo mode
> so have a pretty large perf impact.
>
> Are you able to try the latest 3.4-rc kernel?

Yes, meanwhile I tried 3.4-rc7. There is some improvement but still a good bit away from 
2.6.34 xenified:

time emerge apache:

		3.2.12-dom0	3.3.4-dom0 (w. patch)	3.4.0-rc7	2.6.34.10-dom0
	real    1m0.560s	0m59.971s (0m58.029s)	0m55.000s	0m47.689s
	user    0m40.939s	0m40.619s (0m40.291s)	0m37.846s	0m41.355s
	sys     0m18.865s	0m18.305s (0m16.837s)	0m16.041s	0m11.441s

time make -j4 (3.2.12 linux compile):

		3.2.12-dom0	3.3.4-dom0 (w. patch)	3.4.0-rc7	2.6.34.10-dom0
	real    5m8.793s	5m4.888s  (5m1.408s)	4m48.839s	4m20.576s
	user    8m1.746s	7m59.726s (7m57.534s)	7m40.129s	7m10.375s
	sys     1m39.010s	1m32.994s (1m29.518s)	1m20.993s	0m56.304s

Regards Andreas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-02 13:11 Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0 Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:30 ` David Vrabel
2012-05-02 17:01   ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03  8:32     ` George Dunlap
2012-05-03 10:46       ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-02 13:31 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-03 10:43   ` Andreas Kinzler
2012-05-03 10:51     ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-07 19:48       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-18 16:39       ` Andreas Kinzler [this message]
2012-05-03 11:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-05-03 11:31 ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB67B5C.9070003@hfp.de \
    --to=ml-xen-devel@hfp.de \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.