From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] firewire: sbp2: remove overzealous alignment constraints
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:26:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB6B06D.9010204@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120518210855.43cc7e0b@stein>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> On May 18 Clemens Ladisch wrote at linux1394-devel:
>> The SBP-2/3 specifications do not require any alignment of data
>> buffers; only their own data structures need to be quadlet-aligned.
>
> SBP-2 clause 3.1.2.24 requires that system memory accepts quadlet r/w
> access.
Most of these definitions are just copied from IEC 13213; system
memory is allowed to accept block R/W requests, and SBP in fact
requires them.
> Memory which is not aligned at quadlet boundaries is not
> accessible by quadlet accesses per IEEE 1394 clause 6.2.5.2.2.
SBP-2 explicitly mentions unaligned accesses in 3.2.2, and 9.2 says:
| When page_table_present is zero, a page_size value of zero indicates
| that there are no alignment requirements.
>> This patch is perfectly safe because there is no actual change:
>> the SCSI framework uses a default block queue DMA alignment of
>> 32 bits anyway.
>
> This code was added after recommendation to set it explicitly in the
> driver:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120137366708017
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.devel/11424
That recommendation was based on the assumption that quadlet alignment
would be actually needed.
> It is probably not going to happen that somebody decreases the SCSI
> default. But perhaps we should still keep this explicit...?
Keeping this would be nothing more than paranoia. But this a perfectly
fine sentiment for a maintainer dealing with real-world firmware, so
you might use the patch below instead. (I'm not budging from my
interpretation of SBP-2. :-)
--8<---------------------------------------------------------------->8--
firewire: sbp2: document the absence of alignment requirements
The SBP-2/3 specifications do not require any alignment of data
buffers; only their own data structures need to be quadlet-aligned.
Fix the comments to reflect this, but leave the actual alignment at
32 bits to avoid theoretical problems with target implementations
that might handle this incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
---
drivers/firewire/sbp2.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firewire/sbp2.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/sbp2.c
@@ -207,9 +207,8 @@ static const struct device *lu_dev(const struct sbp2_logical_unit *lu)
#define SBP2_MAX_CDB_SIZE 16
/*
- * The default maximum s/g segment size of a FireWire controller is
- * usually 0x10000, but SBP-2 only allows 0xffff. Since buffers have to
- * be quadlet-aligned, we set the length limit to 0xffff & ~3.
+ * The maximum SBP-2 data buffer size is 0xffff. We quadlet-align this
+ * for compatibility with earlier versions of this driver.
*/
#define SBP2_MAX_SEG_SIZE 0xfffc
@@ -1530,7 +1529,10 @@ static int sbp2_scsi_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
sdev->allow_restart = 1;
- /* SBP-2 requires quadlet alignment of the data buffers. */
+ /*
+ * SBP-2 does not require any alignment, but we set it anyway
+ * for compatibility with earlier versions of this driver.
+ */
blk_queue_update_dma_alignment(sdev->request_queue, 4 - 1);
if (lu->tgt->workarounds & SBP2_WORKAROUND_INQUIRY_36)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4FB67AFC.7090402@ladisch.de>
[not found] ` <4FB67BDD.2030707@ladisch.de>
2012-05-18 19:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] firewire: sbp2: remove overzealous alignment constraints Stefan Richter
2012-05-18 20:26 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2012-05-21 20:09 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB6B06D.9010204@ladisch.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.